Embeddings and rerankers
Encoders and re-rankers appropriate to your language mix and domain.
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is how assistants answer questions using your documents and tickets as evidence, instead of guessing from model weights alone. Databotiq builds internal assistants and customer-facing copilots where citations, permissions, and freshness matter as much as fluency.
Generic chatbots hallucinate on proprietary details.
Static FAQs rot the day after launch.
Engineering teams underestimate chunking, access control, and eval work.
Nobody owns refresh when manuals and policies change weekly.
We implement hybrid retrieval (lexical + vector), re-ranking, and answer policies that force citations for factual claims. Access control is enforced at retrieval time so private docs never enter the model context for unauthorized users.
We build question sets from real tickets and operator interviews, then measure groundedness, refusal quality, and latency under concurrent load. Not only BLEU-like proxies.
Specificity earns trust. The choices below reflect what we ship today, and they will evolve as new models and tools clear our internal evaluations.
Encoders and re-rankers appropriate to your language mix and domain.
Indexes sized to your corpus and update cadence, with hybrid lexical search.
Chosen for instruction-following and citation discipline at your latency budget.
Manuals, bulletins, and work order history.
Policy assistants with strict ACLs from your identity provider.
Answers that must cite public docs only, with refusal on weak evidence.
This pattern is for teams where technicians ask the same questions across plants but answers depend on machine revision, region, and superseded bulletins. The assistant must cite sources, respect access control, and refuse when evidence is weak, because wrong torque is not a branding problem.
Read the case patternOperators get answers they can trust enough to act, because the assistant shows sources, admits uncertainty, and routes edge cases instead of improvising.
Specifics on accuracy, deployment, integration, and the proof path. If something isn't covered here,ask us directly.
When facts change frequently and you need citations. Fine-tuning can still help tone or small specialized tasks, but it is a poor substitute for a living document corpus.
Ground answers in retrieved passages, require citations for factual claims, and use refusal policies when evidence is weak. We tune this empirically on your eval set.
The retrieval layer enforces ACLs from your identity provider or content system. If a user cannot read a doc in SharePoint, it cannot appear in context.
On a schedule tied to document churn. Weekly for fast-moving teams, daily for some support corpora. We automate invalidation on document updates where APIs allow.
Yes, when your security model requires it. We can self-host models for sensitive environments.
A Rapid POC on a slice of your corpus with side-by-side comparisons to your current search or support macros, plus latency and cost measurements.
We run a sandboxed Rapid POC so you can evaluate outputs, integrations, and risk before you fund production.